I make plenty of mistakes as well but I try not to get blindsided by them. The only way to see them coming though is to create specific threat models which run counter to your primary view. And so here is the threat model for GDXJ.
The first threat after a 3rd wave finishes is that the next wave will be a horizontal triangle (HT) 4th. I think this threat is busted due to how high it has retraced. HT need to stop about 15 degrees or more below the top of the a wave.
The next threat is that the retracement will be a zig zag or a flat. A flat has a 3-3-5 count. Its possible that the a wave within blue is a 3, the next wave down is a 3 and with one more thrust to ~$30 or ~$31 the current wave will be a 5. This would screw a lot of EW counts that I see out there which believe that the current wave up must be 1 of a new bull market. They don't even consider the possibility that it is black 4 as shown.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f377/2f377002e712e1d646a1fd7e8431b33c7f5a0c1f" alt=""
The market can go either way. Nobody and I mean nobody knows for sure what the herd will do tomorrow. There are only odds and triggers.
By the way, it is possible for GDXJ to move up past 31 without busting the threat model. The level of the prior 4th HT is $30.50 - $35.
Also just to be clear "threat model" does not mean "primary model" or even "first alternate". It simply means "still quite possible and it would be bad if it happened so keep an eye on the threat".
Also, if the wave cannot make a higher high then we have to wonder if this is a wedge based C wave (WC) under my proprietary view that wedges are usually if not always 3rds or Cs.
No comments:
Post a Comment