Many will look at the blue neckline and the gap down below it and decide to go all in short because a H+S broke the neckline. They might in fact turn out to be right even though I do not like H+S whose left shoulder starts from below the neckline like this (red circle). Too many of these break back up above the neckline. And while I do recognize the power of that gap below the neckline, I have the luxury of having predicted this weakness in advance and that means I don't have to take unnecessary risks. IF there is one thing that defines a good trader it is not making top or bottom calls correctly. That is the "drive for show" part of the game. It's flashy and sexy and gives bragging rights, all of which are emotional in nature and therefore self destructive to the trader over time.
The "putt for dough" part of the equation is risk management and it is the tougher of the two skills to master because it requires that you almost completely disassociate gain with pleasure and loss with pain. This is almost impossible for humans to do and those emotions blind you to the data.
I'm not saying that $COMPX must bounce like Cyan here. In fact, primary is red and secondary is blue. What I AM saying is that if cyan were to happen with me quinted up in UVXY then it could devastate my trading account. So I will now step back and let the rush of emotion (what can I say, it's hard to avoid!) of today's gains dissipate. This is my money now, not theirs, and I need to think of it like that.
4 comments:
Hello Cpt.
How is the USO correction from Jan 28th different in terms of structure than UGAZ? Couldn't it be counted as abcde in the same way? especially if gold is due for a correction and general market for an up tick, oil should get a bid.
Many thxs,
L.
Not sure what you are talking about here L. Current model for USO says blue 4 was at the very end of January. That structure looks corrective to me. Then motive down into red 1, corrective up into red 2 and now perhaps but not yet confirmed motive down into red 3. The current wave could be 1 of 3. We will know soon based on wave behavior but any move above $8.8 on USO will require that I reconsider the count on that.
UGAZ is counted as in the early stages of C of 4 but again we will know probably by tomorrow if that is still a reasonable count or not.
Man I can't believe that UVXY has lost ~8% since my post a few minutes ago. All is not lost there yet because it did stop short of going into the range of what would have been 1 up and it did so with a unicorn tail. A very reasonable bet would be to buy here and then stop out at $48 but I don't trust it not to gap down tomorrow so I would initiate this bet at the open tomorrow, not today's close.
I see what you mean, I didn t see down into 1 as motive, more like this count:
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-hsd2yCUw1-Y/VrkayuWbEkI/AAAAAAAASiE/3bV8UxIct7Y/s1600/CLJ16-February-8-2016.png
Expected/ing 4 in oil to have more leg, especially with gold, dollar and stocks possibly ready to turn, time will tell... I have to admit, more often than not, motive or corrective ends up fooling me. Looking at oil right now I could swear I see 1-2 1-2 bullish, just like gold looked in December.
Hard call with UVXY, it truly could go anyway, still many gaps down in the VIX that will eventually have to close. This has been a good and accurate count for some time:
http://danericselliottwaves.blogspot.ca/
cheers,
L.
The DanEric count is the same as EWIs.
Even though they doubled since I bought them, I kept my MCD 2017 $87 puts just in case the wave count ends up extending the 3rd wave.
Post a Comment