A recent Bloomberg poll shows that Hillary has just recorded her lowest poll numbers ever.
Wow. Who'd a thunk this was possible. After all, wasn't Hillary going to get a zillion dollars worth of backing and become simply unbeatable because, as we all know, money buys elections?
That link was from April 10th and Hillary looked like a shoo-in at the time. But I was a lone contrarian view. I wrote, "...I want to be on record yet again saying that, according to my
socionomic models, she will not win. In fact, it should not even be
close. I think the 2016
elections will change the long standing view that money can buy any
election and I think it will be a shock to the global political elite
who are used to using Mammon Money to buy everything, including
fake/temporary loyalty. I think the herd is awakening in a way where it will vote principles over false promises.
I admit that this is like trying to pick the very bottom of a trend in
honesty or the very peak in a trend of corruption. The odds are always
with the status quo until they are not. But I have been presenting
proof points for my "new conservative wave" model for some time and they
still seem, in aggregate, to be supporting my views."
I recently read some quote from Hillary about the email scandal. She said in so many words that a year ago none of this would ever even have been an issue so she was confused as to why it suddenly is one now.
Well, you readers know why because I have been calling the play by play on this for quite some time now. The herd is turning conservative. The people have figured out that liberal extremism is not beneficial to their prosperity. These grazing grounds of debt have lost their taste and so it's now time to head south in search of greener pastures. The herd takes a long time to make up its mind but once the collective mind has had a critical mass change, the rest is inevitable. Those people holding the "We love Hillary mindlessly and for always" signs will look around, find themselves in a minority, begin feeling very uncomfortable about that and then eventually find a way to quietly ditch the signs and try to blend in with the next movement of the herd.
And so here is wisdom for your consideration: the loudest political voices actually have no political conviction. Their goal is simply to push the status quo of the the current herding direction and then stand around and take applause like the herd required their leadership in order to get out of bed in the morning. Many will change their political affiliations (like the KY clerk recently did). Many will be forced out like Boehner recently was. By the way, notice who forced him out. It was "the radical conservatives". I think "radical" can be translated to "true" at this point. But what is more important is why now? Why not 1,2 or more years ago? Has the crybaby of congress really changed and so he must be eliminated? NOOOOO! He's the same old useless jerk today as he was 2+ years ago. The only thing that changed is the support that is being given to the more conservative players now. The conservative wind has blown in as certainly as if it were Texas allergy season. It is affecting everyone even if they cannot see it.
What an incredibly interesting experiment this has been in socionomics.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment