It's already bounced higher than I showed above but that was a pretty meek b wave that I modeled. In any case, C should be about done if this is really a corrective wave like I am modeling but upside to close the gap at 2.36 is still quite possible. You have to be careful here though because if my model is right the next wave is a 3rd or C down. Better safe than sorry.
Monday, November 30, 2015
[PLUG] update
At the backlink I was worried about one more big swoon.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d70d9/d70d9e398da366f75d983e74735b3b6d68ff9b6d" alt=""
It's already bounced higher than I showed above but that was a pretty meek b wave that I modeled. In any case, C should be about done if this is really a corrective wave like I am modeling but upside to close the gap at 2.36 is still quite possible. You have to be careful here though because if my model is right the next wave is a 3rd or C down. Better safe than sorry.
It's already bounced higher than I showed above but that was a pretty meek b wave that I modeled. In any case, C should be about done if this is really a corrective wave like I am modeling but upside to close the gap at 2.36 is still quite possible. You have to be careful here though because if my model is right the next wave is a 3rd or C down. Better safe than sorry.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment