Rise of true libertarian conservatism - more evidence

The police state and the nanny state are both supported by a fraudulent money supply.  Imagine if we lived in a world where money and credit (which spends like money in the market place) could not just be created out of thin air by bankers and then exchanged for things whose value, unlike that of the currency, is undeniable because they required work in order to produce.  Imagine a world where government had to live within the taxes it collected from the people.  Would any of us agree to triple or quadruple our current level of taxation?  No?  Well that is what it would take in order to pay for the expansive, unaccountable government that we currently have.  Do you think that building massive NSA-owned supercomputers is free?  Do you get any benefit from them or are you simply a victim of them?

In a real economy, people do not exchange their labor for something whose main goal is to control and harm them.  This kind of criminal behavior only exists because the people have had the world pulled over their eyes by the con men running the fraudulent money supply.  If fiat currency and fractional reserve banking collapsed, the stock of real producers would go up, not down.  The world would begin to value them as value producers once the haze of fake value driven by a fake money supply was removed.  Since all newly created value comes from the labor of man and since money is treated as a store of value, printing money from thin air is effectively the naked shorting of human labor.  It is criminal in nature and is technically, in economic terms, a form of slavery.  Those running this game are guilty of treason against the people of the United States and of the whole Earth and their treachery deserves a traitor's fate.

If fiat currency and fractional reserve banking collapsed then all of these secret "black" projects which we aren't supposed to know about and which we don't get any benefit from would shut down overnight due to lack of funding.  Government would try to punish the people for this just as Obama tried to punish the people with national park shutdowns and Barrycades in order to get us to agree to his scam budget.  But once the worm turns, it does not go back.  The people of the US are armed, pissed, and dangerous.  If the US government wants want a civil war then it shall have one.  All it has to do is keep on pushing the fake money supply upon the people against the will of the rapidly awakening herd and I guarantee you that the lions, having gone one step too far, will feel the horns.

Of course, some of the lions are paying attention.  They are trying to shut this scam down before it results in full on civil warfare.  They've seen the lion and the water buffalo video (or some variant of it in history) and they know that once the people wake up en masse there is absolutely no stopping them from changing direction.  The people will easily throw off any attempt by the US government to herd us into a corral where the strong among us can easily be culled.  It is a fool's errand to even try.  Again some can't see this.  Some think the US government is omnipotent and omniscient.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  It is like the wizard of oz.  There is an old, impotent wizard hiding behind a big machine that shoots forth "shock and awe" in order to befuddle the herd.

But the US herd is unlike any other herd in the history of man and we can thank our founding fathers for this differentiation.  Unlike others, we are armed.  We can defend ourselves in a SHTF situation.  Many would die, 10s of thousands even.  But 50k Americans died in Vietnam so the numbers aren't as big as they might seem.  And those guys were fighting in someone else's back yard.  I pity the fool who thinks the US military has any chance of long term subjugation of the American people, especially once the military has to admit that it does not hold the moral high ground.  All that has to happen to shut down their will to fight its own people is the plausible, Snowden-like revelation that 911 was an inside job.  This is something that I have repeatedly predicted will occur before the collapse of the great debt Ponzi is over.  All of the silence paid for with all of that fraudulent money will be ended.

Today I see the signs of the enlightened lions trying to avoid a civil war.  They know that the people must see some leadership from their elected leaders else the risks of internal warfare go up in locked step with credit deflation.  And so look at them go after Eric Holder now over something that would never have been an issue a few years ago: the heavy handed treatment of Aaron Swartz.  Look at the bipartisan nature of the attack: "Sens. John Cornyn, R-Texas; Ron Wyden, D-Ore.; Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.; and Reps. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.; James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis.; Alan Grayson, D-Fla.; Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif.; and Jared Polis, D-Colo".  This is bad, bad news for the police state IMO.

Swartz was a hacktivist.  He committed a crime in order to help the people.  He was Wave 1 in the new direction whereas Snowden was a 3rd wave.  Swartz was very influential in killing SOPA which was a control mechanism wrapped in anti piracy clothing.  Swartz was telling us all about the massive NSA spying long before Snowden proved it.  Swartz ended up killing himself after receiving the full force of government slapping him down.  Like all government cowards, they gang up on an individual who threatens their agenda and then they go in "heavy".

Here is where I have to digress into a significant tangent.  The herd (me included) learned a huge lesson care of a crazy guy named Christopher Dorner who back in early 2013 threatened the LAPD with "asymmetrical warfare".  I was absolutely amazed at the reaction!  I thought that they would just roll their eyes and say "Yeah, let him rant.  We'll get the bastard.".  After all, that's what they do if an average citizen gets murdered.  And then they go have a doughnut.  But not this time.  It was very different this time.  Dornier was not threatening the general public.  He was threatening the police and their families.  Instead of it being a normal man hunt, the police department literally panicked.  They literally freaked out and in doing so they tipped their hand.

You see, these boys are used to kicking in someone's door after dark with 10 heavily armed riot police and then shooting unarmed people to death for no reason.  This is what the police state calls justice.  And when they do it, they feel strong because they are a gang and they are using gang tactics rules against individuals (shoot first, ask questions and offer fake apologies later).  The odds are so stacked in their favor that it's not funny and so they feel tough.  But I see it for what it is: an act of abject cowardice by dick-less little men who pump themselves full of steroids (literally) in order to feel relevant.  But when they looked at the size and training and words of Dorner and when they realized it would not be easy to catch him off guard or unarmed, well, the LAPD just about peed its panties.

They began running scared and shooting at anything that moved.  After all, their actions could always be papered over with fake money or money stolen from the other citizens.  But still, they tipped their hand: the police are afraid of focused, prepared citizens.  They are only brave when they control all the factors.  Throw in some unknown wildcard and their yellow stripe begins to glow in the day time.  Dorner was police state vigilantism wave 1.  Since then we have had relative calm which I see as wave 2.  Don't get too comfortable with it because my EW model shows a 3rd wave of armed rage against the police state coming.  Dorner was wave 1 like Swartz.  The next vigilante cop killer will be more like Snowden in both effect and in success.  I hate to say it but many people will actually cheer for the coming killer(s) of police and related authorities.  I do not hope to see it.  I would rather that the fake money supply collapse first and that it take down the police state economically rather than via physical force.  But I have to go with my models since they have served me very well in the past, and my model says that some kind of 3rd wave of vigilantism is going to appear, and probably in 2014 some time.  Let's hope I'm wrong about that!

Back to Swartz now.  In normal times, the story would have ended with his death.  Live fast, die young and all that bit.  But the worm has turned.  The fake money supply is sputtering and with it comes social change, change that Obama did not envision and that he does not like.  Snowden basically proved that the feds threw the book at Swartz for having the audacity of being a whistle blower.  All whistle blowers have to commit some sort of offense against the system in order to gain credible proof of their accusations.  So we have to really consider whether honest hactivisim is a crime or not.

I'll go waaaaaay out on a limb here and predict that we will see something that I will call "Aaron's Law" be put in place which will basically protect whistle blowers as long as their motive was to point out corruption.  Nobody and I mean nobody is saying this right now so it might take some time to happen but all the foundation for this is shaping up right now so don't be surprised when it materializes in some form or fashion.