Will gun control stop mass murders??

Childishly naive people think that if you get rid of guns then you get rid of mass murder even though history shows very clearly that the largest mass murders in history have been done by governments to their own people who would not do as they were told.  A full 5% of all white males living free in America were killed by their British masters when they would not pay taxes as demanded in the American revolutionary war.  Did they deserve to die simply for not wanting to pay some parasites living in another land the protection money demanded of them?  Of course not.  But men with guns came over in boats and killed them anyway.  This is the historical record.  And white men with guns killed poorly armed native American Indians in order to steal their lands.  Don't worry, though, because it was all nice and legal because some white guy wrote it down on paper and then signed it into fake truth.

There is no fair treatment of those who have no negotiating power and disarmed people are mute at the negotiating table lest they receive a rifle butt between their eyes.  I just don't understand why so many people do not understand that there is NO real freedom unless you have the capability to credibly defend it.  It is the balance of power that supports real freedom and nothing else.

But even at the lower level of abstraction, will getting rid of private gun ownership really make us safer?  Well, not if you live in Canada, it seems, where some dick face just used a rental van to drive up on the sidewalk on purpose in order to mow as many innocent, unarmed people down as he could until the vehicle died due to the damage inflicted upon it from colliding with 10 dead people.

This was a clear case of domestic terrorism.  Some young punk who is angry for reasons that he is too immature to understand decided that his situation was hopeless and so he should "get even" on society by killing random people.  This is so fucked up in so many ways.  If you are mad at someone for something then go after the offending party, not just some random stranger.  And it is clear that the psychos doing vehicle killings around the world would in fact kill the offending person if they had any clue who that was.  But they don't know because they are ignorant.  All they know is that they are getting screwed and there is no way out.

Well, I know who is to blame for all these feelings of hopelessness and it is no other than those running the global debt Ponzi.  The use of fake money has made the rich very rich and stomped the crap out of the dreams of the poor to the point where everyone is just angry at everyone else and for no real good reason except that the mood has turned angry.

And so during these crazy times, some liberal political fuck wad not only wants to disarm me but actually thinks they will be able to do it without getting a bullet between the eyes?  All I can say is that anyone who thinks they can take away my protection from the angry domestic terrorists then go ahead and try.  A real Canadian patriot would have been armed and would have put a few bullets into the deranged driver of that van before he had done so much damage.

So what do we do now?  Do we ban vans?  How about banning rental vans?  How about needing a psyche profile before being allowed to rent one?   Of course then people will just steal a car instead.  Of course then the police can arrest the person whose car was stolen and then charge him for aiding and abetting a terrorist. 

Why do all these potential solutions sound stupid to liberal gun grabbers when this is exactly what they want done to legit and honest and law abiding gun owners?