Ever since Bernanke started pumping money into the economy in 2009, he blew a gigantic asset bubble in the hopes of re-igniting the Keynesian animal spirits. Of course, Keynes was a con man and a fraud, well versed in the art of the grift. He would preach 90% good truth mixed in with 10% killer bullshit. Things like "government can stimulate the economy as long as it unwinds the position when times improve". But what if the only reason for any improvement was the stimulus?
This is the game that the con men play. This round of it has been ongoing since 1913 when the Federal Reserve was created out of thin air in order to cheat us all our of our labor (an act that used to be called slavery).
Let me ask you something. If I came into a room and tried to talk to people about things which I am pretty well versed in, would anyone listen? If I was wearing tennis shoes, jeans and a tee shirt, would anyone take me seriously? Of course not. If I came in wearing a $1000 suit and $300 shoes then I would fare much better regardless of the fact that the information would be the same. But if I had the suit and the shoes, was driven to the door in a limo (or landed with loud fanfare in a helicopter) and had a business card that said "Federal Reserve" or some other big sounding title then I would get instant credibility. Now, lets also say that I practiced the art of sophistry before I came in. Let's say Greenspan coached me in "green speak" or "fed speak". Let's say I had a staff of people behind me (not paid for by me of course...) and all kinds of media propaganda backing up every word I say. Let's say I worked in a big, pompous, impressive granite building in the heart of an expensive city (paid for by someone else of course)... Armed with these things, people would listen to anything I would tell them. None of this was accidental, it was all planned.
I hope you get the picture but if you don't then I strongly urge you to read a little book by a man named Robert Ringer. It's called, "Winning Through Intimidation" and it is a real eye opening gem; a glimpse into how the human brain works. You see, most people simply don't think in these terms (using passive aggressive techniques, subtle intimidation, etc. to screw their fellow man over) and so we normal, non-sociopaths don't ascribe those kinds of thoughts to others. In fact, if someone mentions to us that con man (intimidation) tactics are being used, our herding instinct and built in, herd-enforced peer pressure (AKA herd intimidation) will cause us to directly accuse the offender of being a conspiracy theorist (which is to say that the person is crazy, unstable, requiring of psychological evaluation and borderline dangerous...). Calling someone this trigger phrase is a passive aggressive dismissal of the facts using the old fallacious argumentum ad hominem. Of course, let's just forget that conspiracies happen all the time and all throughout history! They can't possibly happen today!
People think like this because they are intimidated and they don't even know it's happening. That's how we foolish people allowed the con men running the show to initially replace our gold and silver coinage with paper markers for same (AKA IOUs or "notes") and then ultimately even remove the IOU from the paper. Since the dollar is now a promise to pay nothing, we are trading monopoly money for our goods and services and anyone who says this obvious truth is considered a whack job at best or dangerous at worst. Of course, once the con collapses and the people see that in fact the king really has no clothing, everyone is all angry and hostile about it. Not so much because they lost everything in the con but rather because they were such Marks and Patsies. It's the recognition of abused trust that hurts our herding human species the most.
Folks, the stock market is a scam. It is NOT a store of wealth. It is in fact nothing more than a gauge of how much debt we have taken on. Margin debt controls the price far more than any real "fundamental" value (whatever that is...). As the credit crash unfolds, margin debt will be unwound and stocks literally have no place to go except down and down hard. As hard as the stocks were pumped up on debt, they will be wound down when the credit crash unfolds. What "credit crash", you might ask, "I don't see no stinking credit crash". Well I don't know what to tell people when I hear this. The math is obvious, the logic is clear, and the historical precedent is legion. You cannot pump everything up using debt without someday having a credit crisis. The credit crash is measured by the asset value crash (stocks, houses, assets of all kinds).
The only question is the timing and that's where Elliott Waves come in. The model below is a perfect wave count. Maybe the count is wrong, nobody can be 100% sure of that so early in the process. But the stocks are breaking down right on schedule, right as the count would predict. It's not conclusive yet but there no none so blind as those who will not see.
Folks, the S+P 500 is now breaking down right now. The channel is broken, the technical damage is now insurmountable. Everyone is already "all in" so there are only sellers, no buyers. Bullish sentiment is at 27 year extremes. A major, major, crash of historical level is about to unfold over the next 2-4 years. It will happen in fits and starts but the average direction will be clearly down, just like it was from late 2007 through early 2009. Any surprises now will be to the downside. People will whine that stocks are going down despite good news from company XYZ. They think the news and the share price are directly correlated. They have no idea that the real driver of share prices for many years now (in fact starting in 1980) is institutional leverage.
This crash will be much worse than the last one because those sons of bitches Greenspan and Bernanke didn't fix anything. They simply pumped the Ponzi up to the next level drawing in ever more Marks and Patsies. There will be swing trade opportunities for sure. Nothing goes straight up or straight down. And some few stocks might buck the trend but it will not be the big names that we all know. Those are already swarmed and infested by leveraged gamblers. Some new leaders will emerge, for example, in Turing Machine grade AI and that sort of thing and they will be invest-able. But the easy money is on the short side and that will be the case for at least 2-4 years going forward.
Keep in mind that huge 1, 2, 3 day drops are possible at times like this. It generally should occur during a 3rd of 3rd. Here's a list of the top 10 one day drops in history. I expect the coming collapse (being a C wave) to contain a drop that rivals the worst drops in history. More and more the real risk to traders will be found in not being short this market when the big collapses take place.
Friday, October 10, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Captain,
Great post! I'd just like to insert a little nuance in regards to US currency. Totally agree that it is no longer backed by anything. But it is in fact backed up by coercion in that it is the only thing the government will accept as payment for taxes. Unless you default of course and then your property or any other assets will be seized. The value of the currency can be driven down exponentially, but it will always have some value if the government enforces taxation, and if people have mortgages, car notes, etc. denominated in US currency.
Cheers!
Chance
Hey Chance,
I agree, fiat currency is good for paying taxes. But if that is all its good for, don't expect even the government to accept it for very long! The parasites need to steal something of value from you in order to survive. If you give them fiat currency that has essentially devolved into toilet paper, they will not be able to turn around and trade it for other stuff of value like food and rent. So the "can never go worthless because it can always be used to pay the taxes" argument is a false one.
History shows again and again that when the money loses all its value, the government just creates a new currency. Why do you think Taiwan has "NT" (stands for New Taiwan dollar? How about the NIS (New Israeli Shekel)? What happened to the old one?
Yeah, that's right, government basically cancelled the old one and conned the Marks and Patsies into accepting the new one because it had lost all of its purchasing power and the parasites could no longer live and multiply and control everyone else using it.
Never forget: the goal is the new alchemy. Create something from thin air, convince everyone it has value and leave THEM holding it. The goal is not to accept it back! The goal is to trade it to fools for their labor.
Captain,
No question that civil wars and bad monetary/fiscal policies can drive a currency to near zero.
The age old question of "how does a government provision itself?" is a tricky one. In modern economies they do it through being the monopolist issuer of the currency (at this point the value is zero) but then demanding payment of taxes in that currency (at this point the value is greater than zero). Using that model they can get people to trade their labor (military, court workers, law enforcement etc.) for that currency. In turn for someone like me that doesn't want to be a soldier, I'm willing to give goods and services to those soldiers (or sell them directly to the government) to get some of that currency in order to pay my taxes (and in order to avoid the possibility of being shot at).
So in order for governments to provision themselves, it seems taxes are a necessary component. I tend to think along the lines of the classical economists like Smith and Mills in terms of what should be taxed. Things like property, and most importantly economic rents should be the main focus of taxation, and things like incomes and real output should not be taxed. Unfortunately that perspective doesn't get much exposure these days. You see Michael Hudson on TV talking about from time to time, but that's about it.
Great talking to you as always, have a great weekend!
Chance
Hi Captain,
I have been following Armstrong economics closely and he has said precisely the same thing you just mentioned. The 2008 crash will look like childs play once this comes crashing down. What is your advice for the average investor once all hell breaks loose? What are some ways in which we can mitigate loses in sectors like real estate? Obviously once this Ponzi falls apart, it might be smart to shy away from the stock market?
Chance, it always starts off noble and good. Government provides a needed service. But with fake money in use, government always ends up the master until the fake money is repealed or the revolution begins.
Anon,
"What is your advice for the average investor once all hell breaks loose?"
Lots of people will lose everything. They won't understand why, but they will know they got fucked and they won't care who they hurt. Just read a story today where a man bludgeoned his wife and 2 young children to death before offing himself. He had lost his job recently, had no savings, lost the house and then lost his mind. Gerald Celente 101.
Expect significant numbers of people, who are now living on government cheese, to be in similar mindset when the cheese stops coming (and it WILL stop coming - real free handouts are only for rich nations, not for nations whose economies have collapsed).
EWI's newsletter says that the coming collapse will be of such a large degree that the continued existence of the US as a unified entity is at stake. Think TX secession that finally happens, etc. Big, world changing stuff is bound to happen when the global financial system disintegrates and that is what we are likely talking about. Go read Bernanke's comments on what happened in 2008 and how it was worse than the great depression (his words). Now potentially double that for 2015-2016.
So you tell me... if all of that is even remotely possible, do you have any food stored? Do you have a gun, ammo and know how to use it? Can you defend yourself and your family if needed? You don't necessarily have to buy a bunker but I approached it for myself like buying SCUBA gear or a motorcycle helmet: spend whatever you think your life is worth.
"What are some ways in which we can mitigate loses in sectors like real estate?"
In the extreme case, don't own any. Renting is a fine choice. If by "real estate" you mean investment real estate, I certainly would not own rental property. Not only will rents go down as future investors pick up houses at half or less of today's prices and then compete with existing landlords on rent OR the tenents are at risk to rip the place apart when their own lives fall apart. I just would not want to be a land lord right now but when the crash is late stage I will exit the stock market forever and go into gold, silver and rock bottom priced real estate.
"Obviously once this Ponzi falls apart, it might be smart to shy away from the stock market?"
By shy away from, do you mean stay as far away from all stocks as possible and even realize that you might get screwed going short if etrade or ameritrade or some other broker goes BK?
I guarantee that major banks will BK in this deal! So will brokerages. Be in the stock market in any way during the 3rd of 3rd of 3rd and you are taking a big risk no matter what you are doing there.
Thanks for your insight. Looks like the future is looking grim.
I'll be graduating college as soon as this all goes down. Hopefully, if I'm on the right side of the market I'll be able to keep myself afloat.
Yes, I was referring to current landlords. Once the sector deflates, it'll look like a promising investment. I also heard that t-bills are a good way to hedge against this since the gov't is almost guaranteed to pay you back.
"...some other broker goes BK?"
That is what was on my mind…Aren't you even remotely uneasy playing with such a large portfolio in something like TVIX? If this becomes a 10 bagger isn't there a huge risk that the there won't be a payout because of BK?
Anon,
As for grim future, each generation has its challenges. I think it will pay to be aware and awake and alert without being melodramatic. I believe there is a Gaussian distribution of possible outcomes ranging from "oh that really sucked" to mad max (WW3). Nobody knows how it will turn out. Why fear it? Understand and engage.
Treasuries are a bad idea. Rising interest rates lower the market value of them and interest rates are ready to begin wave 3 up. The fed doesn't control them like people have been told, the market controls them (a fact clearly shown by the data).
As for risk, yes it is there. I am aware of it and I know what to look for. We have time still. I don't expect the worst things to happen until the 3rd of 3rd of 3rd. We've barely just begun this game.
Post a Comment