Current action gave us a retracement, looks like it is probably A and B of 2 (or B). If you missed out on the initial move up do not feel bad. Many experienced EW players do not give a crap about catching the exact bottom. Even I admit that it is mainly for sport. Or more to the point, it is a lot more risky, a lot more likely to stop you out, etc.
Where things tend to stabilized in on the reversal is during wave 3 up. Additionally, since 2nds are often deep vees, the patient EW analyst will be looking for this to occur in an a-b-c fashion. 1.82 is the 61.8 fib and 1.70 would be the 70.7 fib. It is also where wave red C would about equal to red A.
Despite the fact that the shares have recently bounced a full 100% (and then some) from the bottom, nothing fundamental has occurred that even remotely justifies this kind of valuation change. So again, I ask those who think that stocks trade on fundamentals the following questions:
- was there a fundamental reason for this bounce?
- was there a true fundamental reason for the crash in the first place? I mean, has the global economy really crashed by 90% like oil services have?
- whatever reason supposedly caused the bounce, did it go away today to result in a large dip?
- why is it that fundamentals can't seem to predict any of these things but my EW charts have, in many cases as a matter of public record, been eerily accurate?
No comments:
Post a Comment