After all the months and months of seriously out of control deadly destructive riots, city block take overs, killings and destruction of small businesses that took place in 2020, trump supporters entered the nations capital building for one day. It is not even clear that all those present were even trump supporters as opposed to antifa antagonists. But there were certainly a lot of trump supporters. They mostly roamed the premises and very little was done in the way of property destruction or even theft. It wasn't good but the media seized upon it can called it "a siege". A 1 day siege might be the shortest siege in history. In any case they are playing it up for all they can, jumping the shark as they go. And the liberals are out pushing their establishment friends to publicly attack trump.
Case in point are all the social media platforms that have canceled trump's accounts, and now banks are being pushed into cancelling their relationships with him and into making public statements which they may or many not want to even make. I thought the statement from Signature Bank as reported here which was "We believe the appropriate action would be the resignation of the president of the United States, which is in the best interests of our nation and the American people. We have never before commented on any political matter and hope to never do so again".
It's one thing for an AOC or some other communist activist to make these kind of statements because that is the business they are in. But banks and corporations are best left out of politics since their job is to make money, not sway public opinion. It is that last portion of their comment which leads me to believe that Signature Bank's actions and words were coerced. They said clearly that they do not make these kind of statements, it is not something they do. Yes they are doing it this time but they hope to never (are coerced) into doing it again. A bank that does not make these statements but that decided any association with trump was bad for business could just debank him and I would respect that if the reason for doing it was to protect shareholder value. But in that case you just quietly close his account without any statement being needed. There would be no requirement and no benefit from repeating the tag line of the left which is currently "resign now".
The fact that they made this statement in a very reluctant sounding way suggests to me that massive coercion is taking place, and that those who would prefer to just stay out of it are being dragged into it against their will.
What is the left so afraid of that they can't wait another week with trump in office to finish his term? I assume that their corruption runs so deep that they know there are strategies to counter what they have done and so their goal is to just scream so loudly that they will demand all the attention until the 20th.
Be careful folks. This could turn into something that you just don't think is possible very quickly. And if it does, remember, it has less to do with gop and dems than it does with the fact that we all got tricked into accepting fake money as if it were real.
No comments:
Post a Comment