Making movies is a business. If businessmen/women see that there is a low risk high reward way to make a profit then expect more and more to go that route. Sure, blockbuster films with highly paid actors and CGI, etc. get a ton of revenue, but not all are profitable and in some cases the losses can be staggering. For example 2018 Robin Hood cost $100mn to make and only $65mn global box office receipts. Assuming a blended 50% (domestic-60%, foreign 40%) box office take by the studio that means they got $33 million plus a piddling Wal-Mart bargain bin DVD revenue and maybe a few million more from streaming, it means that someone burnt up $40-$50 million on that dud. Someone took too much risk re-making robin hood for the 200th time. But the Unplanned max loss was $8mn on the risk side and now the reward side could be as high as $20-40 mn. That's what I call ROI. And when movie makers see ROI they will do more of same in order to repeat the past success.
Saturday, April 13, 2019
Unplanned update
In this post from last week I wrote that the anti-abortion film, "Unplanned" was made for $6mn and whose best days of revenue generation were still to come. At the time, the box office receipts were $8 mn. Today, the left gets another unplanned wake up call as the box office revenues from this low budget film topped $14 mn. If you accept the general rule of thumb that the studio gets about 60% of a film's US ticket sales and also assume that the advertising budget for Unplanned was very low (MAYBE 1 or 2 million), then the current $14 mn number represents break even for the studio while still early in theater runs (remember, theaters showing it are now increasing by 50%). And then there is overseas showing and DVD/streaming revenues.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72d40/72d402b9a85aca52ebbf6197e316e23f76d135d8" alt=""
Making movies is a business. If businessmen/women see that there is a low risk high reward way to make a profit then expect more and more to go that route. Sure, blockbuster films with highly paid actors and CGI, etc. get a ton of revenue, but not all are profitable and in some cases the losses can be staggering. For example 2018 Robin Hood cost $100mn to make and only $65mn global box office receipts. Assuming a blended 50% (domestic-60%, foreign 40%) box office take by the studio that means they got $33 million plus a piddling Wal-Mart bargain bin DVD revenue and maybe a few million more from streaming, it means that someone burnt up $40-$50 million on that dud. Someone took too much risk re-making robin hood for the 200th time. But the Unplanned max loss was $8mn on the risk side and now the reward side could be as high as $20-40 mn. That's what I call ROI. And when movie makers see ROI they will do more of same in order to repeat the past success.
Making movies is a business. If businessmen/women see that there is a low risk high reward way to make a profit then expect more and more to go that route. Sure, blockbuster films with highly paid actors and CGI, etc. get a ton of revenue, but not all are profitable and in some cases the losses can be staggering. For example 2018 Robin Hood cost $100mn to make and only $65mn global box office receipts. Assuming a blended 50% (domestic-60%, foreign 40%) box office take by the studio that means they got $33 million plus a piddling Wal-Mart bargain bin DVD revenue and maybe a few million more from streaming, it means that someone burnt up $40-$50 million on that dud. Someone took too much risk re-making robin hood for the 200th time. But the Unplanned max loss was $8mn on the risk side and now the reward side could be as high as $20-40 mn. That's what I call ROI. And when movie makers see ROI they will do more of same in order to repeat the past success.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment