Usually when someone sits in front of congress asking for something, they are conciliatory, will take any kind of crap they have to take in order to get what they want. That's the liberal way of doing things. You play nice with the powers that be because you are petitioning them for favor. In stark contrast Kavanaugh has come out swinging at congress, even to the point of warning about the obvious lines that have been crossed can go both ways. He told them that they can vote him up or down but they will not intimidate him into backing down.
Instead, he's come out angry as a hornet and resolved to call a spade a spade. He not only explained that Ford was making unfounded accusations but also apparently had some kind of diary for the time in question which he could take excerpts from. I can only presume this document has been submitted for review to make sure it is credible and that he didn't just write it up last week. He had details that were every bit as convincing as Ford's story. But unlike Ford, nobody was there to say "I don't know what he's talking about".
The crowd sitting behind BK was also quite convincing starting with the sad look on his wife's face off of his right shoulder. Nobody in the background seems disinterested or bored. They all appear to be sad at the attacks or pissed about them. I don't know who all these people are besides his wife, but their images added to the somber and direct tone of his testimony and this is how most Americans will experience it.
Ford is now completely and utterly discredited. I suspect that having tried this and failed, she will eventually end up losing her job. Why? Because when BK gets confirmed, her liberal bosses will want him to know that they were not behind this. BK has made it clear that there will be backlash from this, and he's100% right. There will be. Also, who will want to take a class with her now that she's made such an ass of herself? Her 15 minutes if over; Ford is toast.
This was one of the best political speeches I have seen, ever. The liberals are now in deep shit. They played their best card and he has now thrown it back in their faces. As I have said many times, not all dems are stupid rabid liberals, not even close. If they were, Trump could never have gotten elected. It took votes from many centrist dems in order for Trump to win. Those good people are going to see Kavanaugh's testimony and they are going to believe that he is being honest and sincere, especially because some of the accuser's stated witnesses have completely disavowed her claims even though they are close friends.
Again, as stated in these pages many times. IF you are going to take your best shot at something, it better be your best shot because at that point if your shot was not effective then you are going to feel the sting of the counter punch. The rabid, insane liberals have taken their best shot and it was not nearly good enough. Dr. Ford's witnesses like Kaiser have disavowed her under penalty of felonious perjury. What else do reasonable people need to hear? But Kavanaugh's testimony was clear, credible, and complete; He will be confirmed into SCOTUS or there will be blood.
And even after he is confirmed, this will NOT be the end of it. Kavanaugh will try to be fair and unbiased at first, for the first couple years. But over time he will in fact be looking for payback. I know that I would. You don't fuck with a good person like this and not expect payback. Conservatives are not pacifists. The Old Testament was not pacifist. It was an eye for an eye. The liberals have completely overplayed their weak hand here and they are going to regret it for years to come. It's possible that this could even sink their chances of a strong anti-Trump rebound this November. The liberal left leadership, for lack of better words, is coming off as mentally insane.
Speaking of Trump, he is also doing the right thing here and staying the Hell out of it. Very few tweets about this process. That is well advised. Kavanaugh is not a child like Trump is. He's not a buffoon. Keeping Trump's big mouth out of this was the best possible play as it will let the sane centrist liberals judge BK on his own merits.
Friday, September 28, 2018
Brett Kavanaugh is a murderer.
That's right, I said it. Brett Kavanaugh is a murderer. I was at a party with him back in 1983 where he was gang raping everything - women, men, even the dog was walking funny. I approached him about it and without warning, BANG! A shot went off in my face. Brett Kavanaugh had sneakily pulled a gun and killed me. It blew the back of my skull clean off. I remember the blood dripping down. And as I fell, my body twisted under the force of the shot so that my eyes, as they were glazing over the for the last time, could see pieces of skull and splatters of brains running down the wall behind me. That foul, despicable human being took my life and then he laughed. He then got with his band of thugs and buried me in a shallow grave right outside the party house where I still lie today.
Yep, that's my story. Don't question me, because it really, really happened. Really. I swear. I wasn't sure at first but then during a 6 day session with "counselors" from the DNC, I was able to remember many of the details, despite having been killed in the attack. And now I expect a little army of brainwashed libtards to go and avenge my death, chanting and shouting the the faces of those who are investigating my obviously true claims.
Yep, that's my story. Don't question me, because it really, really happened. Really. I swear. I wasn't sure at first but then during a 6 day session with "counselors" from the DNC, I was able to remember many of the details, despite having been killed in the attack. And now I expect a little army of brainwashed libtards to go and avenge my death, chanting and shouting the the faces of those who are investigating my obviously true claims.
Thursday, September 27, 2018
WSJ:"the left is consumed with hate"....
In another example of what I have been saying about the more intellectual left leaners being embarrassed by the antics of the rabid liberals, the Wall St. Journal attempts to explain why, in their own words, "the left is consumed with hate".
I didn't read the full story because a) I wouldn't pay money to subscribe to a liberal rag and b)what they are saying in the headline is so straightforward and obvious that you'd have to have been living under a rock for the past 3 years in order to not already understand what they are referring to.
I want to go on record once again that liberalism=emotionalism and that it is trademark liberalism to have opinions, strong ones, even in absence of any hard data. That's because they think so highly of themselves that of course their thoughts are of leadership caliber, blah blah blah. So all these liberals are pissed off because they see, and have seen even under Obama who did nothing to change it, that they are not only not getting ahead, they are slipping behind. Thus, they make up all sorts of opinions on why that might be while violently supporting the true cause of their pain.
In truth none of these people have a clue why they are so pissed, but they "know" they must be the victim of someone else's nefarious deeds. They will never look internally or take any responsibility for it themselves. But the root cause is of course self inflicted. If they understood that the source of their pain is that they allowed themselves to be conned into believing that something for nothing is in fact possible and that big godverment (sic) can be trusted. They signed on for every consume now, pay later deal the government offered them and they never worried about the bill coming due; they always believed someone else would end up paying it because you can't squeeze blood from a stone. But in their blissful ignorance they did not understand that if you are doing a Vegas deal and you don't know who the Mark or Patsy is, it's you.
And so their dear leaders just kept on printing more fake money and giving it mostly to the elite while letting some trickle down through social welfare programs in order to let the willing idiots think that they were on the right side of the con. Nothing could be further from the truth and when the hammer finally comes down, the bulk of the civil unrest from the left will be driven mainly by one thing: embarrassment at having gotten scammed by their dear leaders.
My story is the same today as it was when I began this blog back in 2010. Everything that has transpired since then has only underpinned my worldview. We ain't seen bad yet, but it's coming and even the liberal leadership now sees that it's coming. But they let their constituents go badly down the wrong path and so this won't be over before we see a pile of bodies at the bottom of the lemming "me too" cliff.
I didn't read the full story because a) I wouldn't pay money to subscribe to a liberal rag and b)what they are saying in the headline is so straightforward and obvious that you'd have to have been living under a rock for the past 3 years in order to not already understand what they are referring to.
I want to go on record once again that liberalism=emotionalism and that it is trademark liberalism to have opinions, strong ones, even in absence of any hard data. That's because they think so highly of themselves that of course their thoughts are of leadership caliber, blah blah blah. So all these liberals are pissed off because they see, and have seen even under Obama who did nothing to change it, that they are not only not getting ahead, they are slipping behind. Thus, they make up all sorts of opinions on why that might be while violently supporting the true cause of their pain.
In truth none of these people have a clue why they are so pissed, but they "know" they must be the victim of someone else's nefarious deeds. They will never look internally or take any responsibility for it themselves. But the root cause is of course self inflicted. If they understood that the source of their pain is that they allowed themselves to be conned into believing that something for nothing is in fact possible and that big godverment (sic) can be trusted. They signed on for every consume now, pay later deal the government offered them and they never worried about the bill coming due; they always believed someone else would end up paying it because you can't squeeze blood from a stone. But in their blissful ignorance they did not understand that if you are doing a Vegas deal and you don't know who the Mark or Patsy is, it's you.
And so their dear leaders just kept on printing more fake money and giving it mostly to the elite while letting some trickle down through social welfare programs in order to let the willing idiots think that they were on the right side of the con. Nothing could be further from the truth and when the hammer finally comes down, the bulk of the civil unrest from the left will be driven mainly by one thing: embarrassment at having gotten scammed by their dear leaders.
My story is the same today as it was when I began this blog back in 2010. Everything that has transpired since then has only underpinned my worldview. We ain't seen bad yet, but it's coming and even the liberal leadership now sees that it's coming. But they let their constituents go badly down the wrong path and so this won't be over before we see a pile of bodies at the bottom of the lemming "me too" cliff.
Tuesday, September 25, 2018
Ted Cruz shows patience with misguided liberals
Liberals go around talking about how bullying is bad, but apparently they only mean that when they are the ones who feel bullied. But when they group into an attack pack and bully someone else, well, then, it's all being done for the betterment of humanity.
Recent case in point is where a bunch of childish idiots surrounded Tez Cruz and his wife chanting their chant loud in their faces. Cruz did the smart thing and took his wife out of there. After they left, the liberals cheered like they had scored a touchdown in some high school football game.
Conservatives are long suffering but not saints. Sooner or later conservatives are going to say enough of this shit and they will stop taking this kind of abuse from attackers. I guess the liberals will then use that proof that conservatives are violent, etc. Something has got to give here. The attackers need to stand down because there is really nothing the victim can do to avoid this kind of bullying and there is no guarantee how much longer they will take it.
But each time they get a "win" like this, they are emboldened and they believe their own "we are doing it for the good of humanity" shit. If this keeps up, there will come a time when it simply becomes easier to kill them than any other option. I don't hope for this but this is historically how civil wars start. You have two sides at loggerheads, both sides emotionally caught up in their own story line and both increasingly intolerant of the very sight of the other side. And that's when one thing leads to another, a miscalculation begins a chain reaction that grows with exponential speed into an all out conflict.
I will say it one last time: liberals, please stop this crap while you still can. Once the shooting begins there will be no choice but for the opposition to wipe you out because only the victor can pardon the atrocities that it will take for one side to win over the other. When you see examples of so called ethnic cleansing in 3rd world shit holes, this is how it happens. Whereas a small scale skirmish might have settled the issue that triggered the big war, once that small skirmish kicks off there is really no going back and so ethnic (or in this case ideological) cleansing has no downside to the combatants. In fact, it becomes the only way to survive and return to a normal life after the battle. Without a clean sweep of the power structure of the opposition, none of the combatants can return to a normal life. So the battle is delayed as long as it possibly can be but once someone starts it, someone is going to finish it.
Again I say to the liberals, stop now. Your queen bitch lost but this is not the last election. Create a new story that the people want to hear and come take the elections back next time. But if you think you are going to bully your way into power, just remember this: Conservatives have the guns and a lifetime of training in their effective use. You have nothing but your childish taunts and thug tactics. One AR 15 is worth 100 thugs. Stop now and play nice before your loud mouths get your asses into something your legs cannot get you away from fast enough.
Recent case in point is where a bunch of childish idiots surrounded Tez Cruz and his wife chanting their chant loud in their faces. Cruz did the smart thing and took his wife out of there. After they left, the liberals cheered like they had scored a touchdown in some high school football game.
Conservatives are long suffering but not saints. Sooner or later conservatives are going to say enough of this shit and they will stop taking this kind of abuse from attackers. I guess the liberals will then use that proof that conservatives are violent, etc. Something has got to give here. The attackers need to stand down because there is really nothing the victim can do to avoid this kind of bullying and there is no guarantee how much longer they will take it.
But each time they get a "win" like this, they are emboldened and they believe their own "we are doing it for the good of humanity" shit. If this keeps up, there will come a time when it simply becomes easier to kill them than any other option. I don't hope for this but this is historically how civil wars start. You have two sides at loggerheads, both sides emotionally caught up in their own story line and both increasingly intolerant of the very sight of the other side. And that's when one thing leads to another, a miscalculation begins a chain reaction that grows with exponential speed into an all out conflict.
I will say it one last time: liberals, please stop this crap while you still can. Once the shooting begins there will be no choice but for the opposition to wipe you out because only the victor can pardon the atrocities that it will take for one side to win over the other. When you see examples of so called ethnic cleansing in 3rd world shit holes, this is how it happens. Whereas a small scale skirmish might have settled the issue that triggered the big war, once that small skirmish kicks off there is really no going back and so ethnic (or in this case ideological) cleansing has no downside to the combatants. In fact, it becomes the only way to survive and return to a normal life after the battle. Without a clean sweep of the power structure of the opposition, none of the combatants can return to a normal life. So the battle is delayed as long as it possibly can be but once someone starts it, someone is going to finish it.
Again I say to the liberals, stop now. Your queen bitch lost but this is not the last election. Create a new story that the people want to hear and come take the elections back next time. But if you think you are going to bully your way into power, just remember this: Conservatives have the guns and a lifetime of training in their effective use. You have nothing but your childish taunts and thug tactics. One AR 15 is worth 100 thugs. Stop now and play nice before your loud mouths get your asses into something your legs cannot get you away from fast enough.
Tuesday, September 18, 2018
Why do liberals think they can do what they tell conservatives to avoid?
The whole "do as I say but not as I do" act from the liberals would get old very quickly if I didn't see the humor in watching them childishly try to offend me without succeeding. As a white male I have seen the liberals work their asses off to try to get me apologize for being born this way even though "born this way" is their own reasoning and justification for all kinds of insane and ultimately self destructing liberal acts. Fortunately, none of their crap is backed by very much logic so you kind of have to be a child to be very offended by their childish attempts to get a reaction. But still, from an intellectual perspective I would like to know why liberals do not understand the gross hypocrisy of their actions.
While hypocrisy is clearly a liberal trait in general, today I am speaking directly to Donald Glover's "whiteface" appearance at the Emmy Awards. First off, Glover's move is a play off of the age old notion of "going blackface", something that is apparently offensive to the liberal crowd even though it's really no big deal logically. Here is a long, overblown, self important explanation about how going blackface is a sin. When I watched the video in that link of some old time guy doing a blackface performance, it struck me that his performance was actually pretty good. He could sing, he could dance. He did not stumblebum around or do slapstick which might lend the oberserver to thinking the character being portrayed was somehow broken or deficient.
If an alien landed on Earth who had never been exposed to emotional liberal labeling and whining were to view that performance, hi might reasonably conclude that the white guy was trying to imitate the black man's ability to sing and dance very well. He might assume it meant that all blacks are talented with the ability to sing and dance. I do not think it would leave a casual observer with the impression that it was supposed to be an insult; to the logical mind it looks more like a compliment.
But liberals are more emotional than logical and so it's considered an insult. Even if I don't find it insulting I respect the fact that others might and so that is enough of an argument to talk me out of going blackface, anywhere, ever. In other words, I don't have to evaluate other people's reasoning before I decide to not do stuff that I have been told they find offensive. There's just no percentage in pissing people off on purpose but without any goal or potential to add value.
This being the case, why do "celebrities" (if Donald Glover can be called that) go ahead and do exactly what they try to shame me from doing? Glover's whiteface character is taken from a TV show called "Atlanta" wherein it plays a character which the article I linked describes as a "creepy, eccentric millionaire named Teddy Perkins". I've never seen this show called "Atlanta" before but from the article I can only gather that this whiteface representation is not complimentary to white people, and specifically to white males.
Now personally, I am not offended at this. It is not hurting me in any way for him to dress up in whatever costume he wants to. But when liberals show their fake outrage at conservatives it is actions like this that lead much of their ranting to fall upon deaf ears. Why would anyone worry about going blackface ever again when Donald Glover went whiteface not to some private party, but to a globally televised event?
The hypocrisy has gotten so bad that the more intelligent liberals are actually feeling bad about this coming from "their ranks". Many are even clearly stating that the problem with widespread adoption of liberalism is too damned much over the top in your face liberalism. I strongly agree with that sentiment. Rabid liberalism is just as annoying and ultimately destructive as rabid right wing-ism. I will not call right wing-ism conservatism because they are clearly NOT the same thing. Right wing-ism is just as destructive as rabid liberalism. That makes both of them liberal in true nature. A real conservative CONSERVES. He does not destroy either capital or people for gain, ever. Destruction of something for gain is a basic component of the liberal notion of "creative destruction". A real conservative only destroys others in response to an attack which inflicted real battle damage onto the conservative. The conservative mindset is to avoid destruction until the process of avoidance is in fact more dangerous and ultimately destructive than stepping up and taking care of the problem.
So go ahead Donald Glover, and all those who think what he did was OK. Have your fun. But the next time I say something you think is politically incorrect I will advise you and people like you to get the Hell out of my face and to shut the fuck up. After all, I will not be held to a standard by the likes of you when you don't apparently hold yourself to any standard at all.
While hypocrisy is clearly a liberal trait in general, today I am speaking directly to Donald Glover's "whiteface" appearance at the Emmy Awards. First off, Glover's move is a play off of the age old notion of "going blackface", something that is apparently offensive to the liberal crowd even though it's really no big deal logically. Here is a long, overblown, self important explanation about how going blackface is a sin. When I watched the video in that link of some old time guy doing a blackface performance, it struck me that his performance was actually pretty good. He could sing, he could dance. He did not stumblebum around or do slapstick which might lend the oberserver to thinking the character being portrayed was somehow broken or deficient.
If an alien landed on Earth who had never been exposed to emotional liberal labeling and whining were to view that performance, hi might reasonably conclude that the white guy was trying to imitate the black man's ability to sing and dance very well. He might assume it meant that all blacks are talented with the ability to sing and dance. I do not think it would leave a casual observer with the impression that it was supposed to be an insult; to the logical mind it looks more like a compliment.
But liberals are more emotional than logical and so it's considered an insult. Even if I don't find it insulting I respect the fact that others might and so that is enough of an argument to talk me out of going blackface, anywhere, ever. In other words, I don't have to evaluate other people's reasoning before I decide to not do stuff that I have been told they find offensive. There's just no percentage in pissing people off on purpose but without any goal or potential to add value.
This being the case, why do "celebrities" (if Donald Glover can be called that) go ahead and do exactly what they try to shame me from doing? Glover's whiteface character is taken from a TV show called "Atlanta" wherein it plays a character which the article I linked describes as a "creepy, eccentric millionaire named Teddy Perkins". I've never seen this show called "Atlanta" before but from the article I can only gather that this whiteface representation is not complimentary to white people, and specifically to white males.
Now personally, I am not offended at this. It is not hurting me in any way for him to dress up in whatever costume he wants to. But when liberals show their fake outrage at conservatives it is actions like this that lead much of their ranting to fall upon deaf ears. Why would anyone worry about going blackface ever again when Donald Glover went whiteface not to some private party, but to a globally televised event?
The hypocrisy has gotten so bad that the more intelligent liberals are actually feeling bad about this coming from "their ranks". Many are even clearly stating that the problem with widespread adoption of liberalism is too damned much over the top in your face liberalism. I strongly agree with that sentiment. Rabid liberalism is just as annoying and ultimately destructive as rabid right wing-ism. I will not call right wing-ism conservatism because they are clearly NOT the same thing. Right wing-ism is just as destructive as rabid liberalism. That makes both of them liberal in true nature. A real conservative CONSERVES. He does not destroy either capital or people for gain, ever. Destruction of something for gain is a basic component of the liberal notion of "creative destruction". A real conservative only destroys others in response to an attack which inflicted real battle damage onto the conservative. The conservative mindset is to avoid destruction until the process of avoidance is in fact more dangerous and ultimately destructive than stepping up and taking care of the problem.
So go ahead Donald Glover, and all those who think what he did was OK. Have your fun. But the next time I say something you think is politically incorrect I will advise you and people like you to get the Hell out of my face and to shut the fuck up. After all, I will not be held to a standard by the likes of you when you don't apparently hold yourself to any standard at all.
Sunday, September 16, 2018
Useless nanny state warnings
All of the following warning signs can be found throughout California and even in online sales to warn us all about the potential health affects of coming in contact with everyday items.
Here's one for wood dust:
Second hand smoke? Yep, there is a warning sign.
Want to buy a cobalt drill bit? Please observe the warning!!
And of course, to keep us all safe even Disneyland has to put up a warning sign:
My question for all this is simple: which bureaucrat or set of bureaucrats in California need to receive a medicinal slap in the face to hopefully get them to stop all of this bullshit? Obviously, the state wants to prove to us all that it cares about our health (even though only a fool would believe such a thing). But its also just as obvious that the signs are useless. Most just tell you that in doing what you are already going to do anyway, you are exposing your body to some kind of danger. Well, that's pretty much the case if you get out of bed each day and live in the real world. Some of the warnings are specific, like breathing some fumes in an underground parking lot or walking through a smoking area. But if you have to be in those places then you really have no choice but to inhale a few breaths of it.
But without exception, these useless warnings don't tell us what we should do instead to protect ourselves or just how much relative danger one threat is over another. All the state cares about is the appearance of caring while also creating a fee collection opportunity for those who do not comply with the posting of useless warnings. Let's face it, if going to Disneyland appreciably increased the odds of cancer or birth defects, Disney would have been shut down long ago. So all of this crap is useless posturing by assholes, the only cure for which I can think of is a sharp strike to the face in order to reset their silly liberal nanny state brains.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

