Thursday, August 29, 2019

Another knife in the side of globalism (and China)

People keep reacting to news that the China trade war is almost over and therefore let's all get bullish on markets again.  I do not see this trade war improving, only getting worse.  And its for reasons that most people do not understand because, having not done any thinking or homework on their own over the years, they simply believe the propaganda headlines.

But if you look even just a little bit under the facade you see the global system crumbling.  Hong Kong is revolting from China.  Argentina is joining Venezuela into the downward spiral.  The middle east is shaky and everyone here in the US is pissed off at everyone else.  Our politicians have dropped any semblance of statesmanship or inter-party cooperation.  It's turned into a vicious political knife fight and, soon enough, actual fisticuffs on the congressional floor.

But back to China for a second.  Today I got an email from ebay which contained this link to an explanation of the Universal Postal Union.  While I never heard of this before, apparently its like a global post office and has been for some time now.  Well, in the face of collapsing globalism, the US is now threatening to pull out of the UPU.

This body was set up almost 150 years ago to help postal operators all around the world communicate and operate with each other. Another thing the UPU does is set the rates that countries charge each other for mail delivery. For a long time, the UPU rate system worked well, but recently it has become more and more unfair for certain mail users. For example, in some cases, someone sending a package from another country to the US may pay less than it costs to ship the same package WITHIN the US.
As a result of this unfair rate system, the US government announced that it is going to withdraw from the UPU. If the US moves forward with this withdrawal plan, it could mean big trouble for anyone who sends or receives mail or packages internationally. Luckily, there is a chance for the UPU to reform its rates before the US withdraws. The US government is currently pushing rate reform to encourage the UPU to change the current system. If that works, the US would likely remain in the UPU, and rates would be set more fairly.

Well well well.  Who can we be talking about here as the low rate offender?  Hmm.  Let's see.  Could it be.... CHINA?  Oh Hell yes it's China.  I have commented MANY times on how China will deliver stuff for almost free.  If people had to pay the actual shipping rate for shit from China to the US, prices of small items would double.  But the USPS doesn't get a free pass here and so they look like the bad guys, overcharging for shipping.  How does China do it?  Well all you have to do is watch the video interview I posted here of exiled Chinese billionaire Miles Kwok.  He says that China has created a fake economy by printing up more than 30 trillion USD worth of Yuan and are spending it on creating the appearance of a strong Chinese "miracle" economy.  What the Chinese are doing is using sneaky debt to drive publicly visible growth.  It's a scam.  And that scam is almost over.  And when it collapses, miracle growth will turn into fugly, nasty collapse.

It's too bad for the American consumer because getting all this high quality free shit from China was a real blessing for the past couple decades but time's almost up for that.  When Americans have to pay the actual postage for stuff from China, a huge collapse will happen to China's dollar based cash flow.  I'll say it again.  China was paying the postage in printed Yuan making it almost free for us (and in many times actually free) to ship a $10-$30 purchase from China to the US.  Shipping for the item should rightfully have cost $10 or $15 even for a small item.  But China hid the cost.  The Ebay link says "luckily" there is still time for this offending player to charge fair rates for shipping, but to volunteer to do so would collapse China so China will not volunteer.  As a result, the US will continue with more protectionism and pull out of the UPU.

Expect everything made in China to get a good deal more expensive once that happens.  If you need to buy shit from China, do it now while prices are still good.

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

Interesting video - liberals are eating their own in China

Real Vision has been putting out some great vids that will open eyes all over the world.  It's the whole notion of a return to truthful investigative reporting that I predicted back in 2015 would be part and parcel of the conservative wave take over.

This Oct 2018 vid is an interview of Miles Kwok, an ex-Chinese elite who cut and run to avoid being killed by the organized crime running China's government.  Miles is interviewed by Kyle Bass in "an undisclosed location" because Kwok has done the international version of turning state's evidence against the Chinese party.  Kwok makes no bones of it: the Chinese economy is fake, 100% driven by money printing.  The leaders, according to Kwok, only care about 3 things:
- who is likely to kill them
- how to get more money from anyone around them
- where their next sex toy girl will come from

Yup, those are right out of a gangster movie, organized crime 101.  And now Kwok, who used to be the equivalent of a capo, is singing like a canary in order to buy favor from someone who can possibly hide him from Chinese assassins.  Kwok says that any Chinese financial institution is a money laundering operation and that they have printed more than 30 trillion USD worth of Yuan in order to pay off people and enrich their friends.  Of course, business and government are always tied at the hip.  

In any organized crime syndicate, when times get tight, the godfather "asks" for those below him to take one for the gipper: take a smaller cut or make "tribute" payments to him as insurance against something bad happening.  And it seems like even those who pay up only have 1 year to live according to Kwok.  At the time of that video, Oct 5, 2018, Kwok said that Alibaba CEO Jack Ma, who had just been stripped of property and CEO position at Alibaba, had only 1 year to live, with maybe a short time in jail first for appearances of justice.

Well the marginal players are hurt the first and worst and so  China's Ponzi will collapse before the US Ponzi will.  Maybe it's Trump's plan to put enough economic pressure on China for their people to rise up and demand regime change BEFORE the next US election.  That way Trump can blame an Asian contagion on China and tell Americans not to change horses in the middle of the stream.

Kwok also made it a point to say that Chinese cameras were everywhere, especially in hotel rooms, and China was an aggressive blackmailer.  I wonder if they have any footage of important Americans doing bad stuff.  If so we will eventually see it come tumbling out of the closet.

I was impressed by how often Kwok used the word "fake" in regards to China.  Fake is liberalism 101.   Fake is not cutting it anymore.  Fake is on the way out.

Saturday, August 24, 2019

Judicial Watch is on the hunt for Hillary

Old school conservatives never forget. One eye must be taken for an eye.  After years of being stonewalled by the liberals running the system, Judicial Watch has risen as a champion of the law. It has learned the system and used the system's rules to attack the bad players, and never allowed the system's built in defense mechanism of stalling, stonewalling, lying and misdirection to stop it from making progress.  Judical Watch now appears to be supported by the new conservative trending justice system.  Instead of directly attacking the old liberal guard directly, the new leadership has figured out that supporting Judicial Watch is as good as or better than doing the wetwork itself.

Today we see Tom Fitton and team taking on Hillary directly in court over her email server and over her gun running in Benghazi.  While other government organizations have given Hillary a free pass for fear of blackmail or fear of ending up in a lake face down or being suicided in jail, Fitton is completely un-intimidated by her, probably because he's not corrupt and she has nothing to hold over his head.

Keep an eye on JW.  They are the tip of the sword in bringing down the deep state.  Bill and Hillary should be planning their move to a nonextradition country right now.  Yeah I know, I know, nobody will be able to bring the Clinton down, blah blah blah.  I've heard it all before, they are too powerful, too connected.  But that's the same thing that people said when she was running for president.  I was crazy to say "anyone but her" would win because she had ridiculous money to spend on the campaign.  But I was right and the naysayers were wrong (bet never apologetic).  So as you can see, I will trust my own models and world view before I listen to others who have been wrong over and over again. 

The trend has changed folks.  The criminal liberal Clintons and supporting agencies no longer have the liberal wind at their back.  They now have a freshening conservative headwind to deal with.  Nothing will come easy for them anymore and sooner or later they will crack under the stress and strain.  I suspect the next thing we hear is that Hillary is too sick to stand trial for her crimes and Bill will be standing there with elephant tears to convince the stupid of his sincerity.  It's all a big show.

The liberals are eating their own.

I have stated many times that liberals occupy a wide range from the very conservative right to center all the way to mentally unstable/mentally ill left.  I have written that the far left suffer from waking delusions and many other mental issues.  These were just my observations as someone standing apart from the herd looking on and trying to make sense of it all.

But now there are medical studies coming from academia which tend to support my views that rabid liberalism is the only know communicable mental disorder.  In the past you would never have academia speak out like this, but the smart left which exist center and right of their group see the craziness building up too high and they realize its counterproductive to their cause.  It's like the liberals in California seeing piles of shit, trash and used needles and condoms outside their work place and begin to realize that they caused this with their crazy talk and crazy policies.  And so they begin to apply the brakes.

That link points to a study Published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine by researchers affiliated with the Boston University School of Public Health, Harvard Medical School and University of Michigan School of Public Health.  As reported here, "The study, which included more than 1,200 college students with gender identity issues across 71 U.S. college campuses, found that, across commonly used mental health measures, 78 percent of the gender-disturbed students met the criteria for one or more of the outcomes of depression, anxiety, eating disorders, self-injury, and suicidality.

From the study itself (note: cisgender is liberal speak for people who identify with their birth gender, GM are those who have been conned into thinking they are another gender of some kind):
Introduction
The purpose of this study was to examine mental health status by gender identity among undergraduate and graduate students.

Methods
Data came from the 2015–2017 Healthy Minds Study, a mobile survey of randomly selected students (N=65,213 at 71 U.S. campuses, including 1,237 gender minority [GM] students); data were analyzed in 2018. Outcomes were symptoms of depression, anxiety, eating disorders, self-injury, and suicidality based on widely used, clinically validated screening instruments. Bivariable and multivariable analyses explored differences between GM and cisgender (non-GM) students as well as by assigned sex at birth.

Results
Across mental health measures, a significantly higher prevalence of symptoms was observed in GM students than cisgender students. Compared with 45% of cisgender students, 78% of GM students met the criteria for 1 or more of the aforementioned mental health outcomes. GM status was associated with 4.3 times higher odds of having at least 1 mental health problem (95% CI=3.61, 5.12)."



Well there you have it, an admission by liberal academia that those who believe they are some random gender are 4.3 times more likely to have a diagnose-able  (in other words, obvious) mental health issue than those who know who and what they are.

Now keep in mind who published this study: American Journal of Preventive Medicine.  Yup, they published this because they think its a preventable disease.  You will not see this journal publishing articles about unpreventable diseases in a vacuum.  For example, if you google American Journal of Preventive Medicine cancer then it comes back with articles about how smoking (which is preventable simply by choices made) causes cancer.  The obvious conclusion is that they think the gender confused have made bad choices and it is leading them to mental disease which could have been prevented.

Of course they can't just make a clean break with the status quo and so the real gist of the study is that the gender-crazy need to be pandered to, supported and spent more money on lest they take advantage of their 4:1 increased odds of suicide.  Yup, more of the thing that made them ill in the first place will certainly be good for them.

Face it.  This new batch of mental illness is ZERO different from the new medical diseases that have popped up (pooped up if you will) in liberal cities across this country.  Those running these liberal shit shows should be arrested and jailed for gross negligence/crimes against humanity.  And they will be in time.  Mark my words because when things get really bad, liberals eat their own.

Friday, August 23, 2019

Darwin is dying and academic science is killing him.

Darwinism is liberalism.  If you analyze the behavior of liberals, it's all about humanism; that is, humans don't need a G_d because we ourselves will bootstrap and science, which we of course discovered, is the answer to all questions.  You can see this attitude in everything around you.
  • We don't need a savior; we have built ourselves an all-powerful Godverment run by humans.
  • We don't need eternal life from our creator; we will use cybernetics to live forever.
  • We ourselves are creators of life; as proof we will create Artificial Intelligence.
  • You don't need to have faith; instead you need to dream.
Liberals believe themselves to be deities.   It's why they are self centered narcissists.  They are actually human haters because, if you are a living G_d walking among the unwashed masses then of course you can probably hardly stand the sight of all the lower beings before you. 

In this matter, liberals are self-accusers.  Look at these campaign posters for Obama.  No conservative would ever do that or even put up with it.  They would be ashamed.  But liberals think it is the natural order and so they think it is truth.

Yup, all you need is faith in Obama and all your dreams will come true.  Now don't shoot the messenger.  His team made those posters and there are plenty more out there with the same message: obama is the savior.  And his speeches are often laced with the message that you don't need a savior and we don't need a messiah.  Nope.  If you got Godverment then Obama and his team will be your savior, your messiah.  I only pick on Obama because he was such a blatant message bringer for the liberal movement.

Shifting toward the Darwin topic, one of my favorite things to watch is the whole notion of "everyone agrees with this so it must be true" as if consensus equates to truth.  Better still "everyone who is educated and smart and who works in academia agrees with this so it must be true" as if consensus equates to truth.

For example, with climate science, how many times did the liberal left just make up statistics out of thin air saying 95% of scientists believe man made global warming is a threat?  Of course that number was NEVER true.  It was just more liberal make believe; another Dream. 
  • Another reason to scare us into paying them more of our labor so that they, our self proclaimed saviors, can lead us away from the danger and toward the light.  
  • Another reason for us to agree that they should control and enslave us.  
Look online, the list of big names that are now disagreeing with the liberal "climate change is caused by humans" mantra grows each week.  And even if it was true, how will giving more money to the liberals fix it?  The whole thing is insane.

Scientists work for academia.  When the liberal spirit is running things, Scientists will speak on behalf of the liberal view.  When the conservative spirit is in charge, we'll hear the conservative view.  IF they didn't buy into the Dream then they would be pushed out of the herd and would have to go work for a living.  They would be attacked.  Remember, when liberals don't get their way they resort to death threats and other crazy violent behavior (cough cough, Antifa, cough).  Liberals eat their own.  Right now we are seeing big cracks form in the whole "humans are responsible" story.  I'll write more about that later.

But what I really wanted to write about today is the coming death of Darwinism.  You know, that "science" that says that everything evolved from chemicals and random activity which somehow (magickly - sic) supported the notion of "natural selection".  Essentially, if you put a pile of just the chemicals on the ground of just the right barren planet and come back a few billion years later you will find in its place a lush world of animal and plant life has evolved from it.  EVERY scientist "knew" this to be true because Darwin's "proved" it in Origin of Species.

Of course anyone who ever actually created anything knows that the act of creating is by definition the expression of intelligent design.  But liberals don't create, the simply consume the productive output of others.  So of course it was difficult for them to see.  And while the wave of rabid liberalism (perhaps best expressed as the spirit of liberalism) was running the show here on Earth, it was even more difficult for them to see; they were in a way blinded.

But liberals are not stupid and there is a whole range of them from rabid left to centrist and even downright conservative people who call themselves liberals.  As the liberal spirit has peaked and is now morphing strongly into a conservative spirit, liberals in general are again able to see more clearly.  Which brings us to this video of Ivy League academics who are actually going on camera to denounce Darwin.  You can watch for yourself here.

A few years ago (and still in most places today) if you questioned Darwinism you would be shouted down in a big way because, after all "all the scientists agree, Darwin was right".  That's it.  That's the argument.  The herd is heading north so herd with the herd, or else.  Think about what you saw in that video.  These are smart guys, well read, highly educated and have the smartest friends around.  They've written books and given lectures, done research and are just generally out of everyone's league intellectually, but still they herded with the herd until fairly recently.  And they don't even question why it is only right now that they are finally waking up to the obvious presence of intelligent design in the creation of humanity and all other life on this rock. 

Of course I saw this change coming long ago; the liberal spirit would peak and the conservative spirit would begin guiding things.  It will be a measured shift. You can see in the vid how they apologize for Darwin because he did not know about molecular biology, etc.  So they are trying to let liberalism down gently but make no mistake, it's going down.  Besides, a good scientist always knows there are unknown unknowns.  Darwin's supporters acted like it was gospel and to this day treat it as a religion - that of humanism.

All you had to to was look around and see how abundant life is on Earth, and how absent it is from every other place we have ever looked for it.  IF piles of chemicals could just self organize and become sentient beings over time then it would happen all the time all over the solar system.  They might not look like humans because of different growth mediums and environments, but the laws of chance dictate that it should have happened.  But it hasn't.  And it won't.  Because as someone who actually creates things from scratch I can tell you, it takes intelligent design to create.  As you might have heard in the video, life is literally encoded, just like software.

If things would self-create we would have definitive evidence of that by now.  And as those in the video said, even Darwin put a time limit on his theory.  He said it would be obvious in time that new species were evolving from existing ones.  But that is not happening and so even Darwin would say he was wrong.  And don't tell me (in the usual liberal tactic) that we just need to wait longer, that if we just do more of what didn't work in the past that somehow it will work in the future.  The changes Darwin used as proof points happened over the course of not many years.  Original of Species was published in 1859.  160 years should be enough time for substantial proof of the evolution of a new species to evolve if it was ever going to happen.

Bye bye Darwin, off to the dustbin of science fact with you and your disciples!

Thursday, August 22, 2019

What happens when Mammon Money loses its grip on the herd?

"Zach" (who is interviewed in this video) used to work for Google.  You can almost tell he worked there just by looking at him and listening to him.  In any case, Zach leaked a bunch of documents implicating Google in information manipulation in order to control the herd.  Google of course fired him and then called the police and reported him as being mentally unstable.  The link above drops you well into his project veritas video to a point in the video where the interviewer is trying to understand why he came forward. 

Zach worked at google for 8 years and at the time of his departure was knocking down $250k in salary and stock.  So not only did he walk away from easy street money, he also pissed off a huge company which is probably capable of doing just about anything if it feels sufficiently threatened.  Zach himself worries that he could be murdered by Google for this leak which portrays Google as having a liberal manipulative hidden agenda.

Zach is a good example of how Mammon Money eventually loses its grip on the herd after the wind begins to blow conservative.  Again, Zach could have blown the whistle at any time, but only now did he decide to throw caution to the wind in order to do what his principles knew was right instead of continuing to accept the money from "not evil" Google.

Zach's claims may sound crazy - that simply manipulating information and spinning this way or that can really have much effect.  But then if it doesn't work, why would Google pay so much attention to doing it per the leaked documents?  People on the right half of the IQ scale have to realize something very important: half the population exists on the left half of the scale.  People in the green box are difficult to fool and maybe even impossible to fool.  They think for themselves and while they might not always say what they think, that is a calculated move in and of itself.

But people in the red box go through life in a confused state as often as not.  They don't understand complex concepts and don't have the mental energy to read or write very much.  They are happy living their simple life, trying to get by with what they have been given by the genetic lottery.  Being of low intelligence is neither good nor bad.  It's just is.  Those folks did not wrong to deserve it and smarter people did nothing meritorious to deserve it.  It's mostly genetic.

That said, if you want to fool people, go after those with diminished IQs.  And if you want to herd them in the direction you want them to go, show them only what you want them to see and tell them only what you want them to hear.  YES, daily input sources like Google and Facebook can and do manipulate people's perceptions.

Now the real question that must be asked is whether what Google is doing is legal or not.  And some might even want to argue that its not immoral, rather it is just an effective tactic.  Without trying to argue one side or the other I can say this: people are proud, even those left of 100.  IF they begin to realize they are being fooled, they get pretty damned angry about being taken advantage of.  I'll leave it at that for now but it will be interesting to see if the herd rises up and gives Google the big smackdown over this.

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More