Michael Moore was one of the loudest idiots pumping for Obama during both the 2008 and 2012 (S)elections. Now he's gone public with his opinion that his hero is actually a "huge disappointment". Of course, like most liberals, Moore blames it all on Obama and doesn't accept any personal blame for being a fool and a patsy. Additionally, Moore champions loudly for wealth redistribution because that's what he was told will make things fair but he has absolutely zero idea of what really underpins wealth (and therefore social) inequality. Let's face it, Moore is quick on his feet and he knows how to debate but he was just as fooled by Obama as all the mea culpas on YouTube by young liberals. In all his years he hasn't really learned a thing.
Michael Moore, please grow up. Stop just parroting what you have heard to be true from those who are actually controlling you like a puppet. I think your intentions are good but that you simply are not technically minded enough to figure out what is really going on. And now that you have spent your whole life ranting away at the rich and successful producers of the world you just don't have the vision to see that your whole approach missed the mark. So here's your chance to make some real progress by finally figuring out the real underlying cause of the unfairness that both you and I know exists. In short, it is the fraudulent money supply which is to blame and nothing else. If the money supply were honest there is no way that an industrialist could earn a million times a worker. It is the fraudulent money supply which we have been taught to accept in exchange for our labor which devalues our labor. Imagine if everyone had to pay wages using monetary metals instead of green paper or simply account entries. The con men could no longer borrow our wages into existence, take a big cut of the loan for themselves and then pass what is left over down to us before eventually defaulting on the loan after they have already left the system with their purchasing power intact.
One more thing, Moore, and for this one you are simply an idiot. You claim that Obama's achievement was to be the first black president.
I have two issues with that. First, Obama didn't do anything special to win. He wore the suit, spoke the lines handed to him by the real powers that be and bathed in the copious campaign funds that were directed towards him. Don't you get it Moore? He was SELECTED. His win does not represent anything for minorities except the fact that they can be bought and used buy the powers that be as easily as a white puppet president like Clinton and the Bushes and all of the rest of them going back to Ike.
Second, being black is not an "achievement", you ASS! The leadership of our country is not the place for you to have your little liberal dance. It is the place that we should put the best and brightest and most loyal to the American people as a whole, MOST of which are not black. Go find some other showcase for your misguided cause. I repeat: skin color is not an achievement nor is is any kind of leadership qualification. Get the right LIBERTARIAN in the office so that we can close down the feral reserve and return to honest money. If we do that then the social injustices will collapse under the pressure of the truly free market (which we currently do not have because of the fake money).
You are being too kind towards Moore by taking him at his words. I myself cannot extend such sycophants because I take them at their actions. For if Moore were sincerely concerned about the distribution of wealth, he'd start by distributing his fortune. But, strangely enough, he's hellbent on distributing my meager scraps.
ReplyDeleteMost Obama voters got what they deserved, but the sycophants got exactly what they selected: a socialist to further their agenda and then discard him as not being socialist enough in order to justify an even more blatant socialist in his place.
After all, doing more of the same failed approach has worked wonders for the elite throughout all spheres of government.