Darwin is dying and academic science is killing him.

Darwinism is liberalism.  If you analyze the behavior of liberals, it's all about humanism; that is, humans don't need a G_d because we ourselves will bootstrap and science, which we of course discovered, is the answer to all questions.  You can see this attitude in everything around you.

• We don't need a savior; we have built ourselves an all-powerful Godverment run by humans.
• We don't need eternal life from our creator; we will use cybernetics to live forever.
• We ourselves are creators of life; as proof we will create Artificial Intelligence.
• You don't need to have faith; instead you need to dream.

Liberals believe themselves to be deities.   It's why they are self centered narcissists.  They are actually human haters because, if you are a living G_d walking among the unwashed masses then of course you can probably hardly stand the sight of all the lower beings before you. 

In this matter, liberals are self-accusers.  Look at these campaign posters for Obama.  No conservative would ever do that or even put up with it.  They would be ashamed.  But liberals think it is the natural order and so they think it is truth.

Yup, all you need is faith in Obama and all your dreams will come true.  Now don't shoot the messenger.  His team made those posters and there are plenty more out there with the same message: obama is the savior.  And his speeches are often laced with the message that you don't need a savior and we don't need a messiah.  Nope.  If you got Godverment then Obama and his team will be your savior, your messiah.  I only pick on Obama because he was such a blatant message bringer for the liberal movement.

Shifting toward the Darwin topic, one of my favorite things to watch is the whole notion of "everyone agrees with this so it must be true" as if consensus equates to truth.  Better still "everyone who is educated and smart and who works in academia agrees with this so it must be true" as if consensus equates to truth.

For example, with climate science, how many times did the liberal left just make up statistics out of thin air saying 95% of scientists believe man made global warming is a threat?  Of course that number was NEVER true.  It was just more liberal make believe; another Dream. 

• Another reason to scare us into paying them more of our labor so that they, our self proclaimed saviors, can lead us away from the danger and toward the light.  
• Another reason for us to agree that they should control and enslave us.  

Look online, the list of big names that are now disagreeing with the liberal "climate change is caused by humans" mantra grows each week.  And even if it was true, how will giving more money to the liberals fix it?  The whole thing is insane.

Scientists work for academia.  When the liberal spirit is running things, Scientists will speak on behalf of the liberal view.  When the conservative spirit is in charge, we'll hear the conservative view.  IF they didn't buy into the Dream then they would be pushed out of the herd and would have to go work for a living.  They would be attacked.  Remember, when liberals don't get their way they resort to death threats and other crazy violent behavior (cough cough, Antifa, cough).  Liberals eat their own.  Right now we are seeing big cracks form in the whole "humans are responsible" story.  I'll write more about that later.

But what I really wanted to write about today is the coming death of Darwinism.  You know, that "science" that says that everything evolved from chemicals and random activity which somehow (magickly - sic) supported the notion of "natural selection".  Essentially, if you put a pile of just the chemicals on the ground of just the right barren planet and come back a few billion years later you will find in its place a lush world of animal and plant life has evolved from it.  EVERY scientist "knew" this to be true because Darwin's "proved" it in Origin of Species.

Of course anyone who ever actually created anything knows that the act of creating is by definition the expression of intelligent design.  But liberals don't create, the simply consume the productive output of others.  So of course it was difficult for them to see.  And while the wave of rabid liberalism (perhaps best expressed as the spirit of liberalism) was running the show here on Earth, it was even more difficult for them to see; they were in a way blinded.

But liberals are not stupid and there is a whole range of them from rabid left to centrist and even downright conservative people who call themselves liberals.  As the liberal spirit has peaked and is now morphing strongly into a conservative spirit, liberals in general are again able to see more clearly.  Which brings us to this video of Ivy League academics who are actually going on camera to denounce Darwin.  You can watch for yourself here.

A few years ago (and still in most places today) if you questioned Darwinism you would be shouted down in a big way because, after all "all the scientists agree, Darwin was right".  That's it.  That's the argument.  The herd is heading north so herd with the herd, or else.  Think about what you saw in that video.  These are smart guys, well read, highly educated and have the smartest friends around.  They've written books and given lectures, done research and are just generally out of everyone's league intellectually, but still they herded with the herd until fairly recently.  And they don't even question why it is only right now that they are finally waking up to the obvious presence of intelligent design in the creation of humanity and all other life on this rock. 

Of course I saw this change coming long ago; the liberal spirit would peak and the conservative spirit would begin guiding things.  It will be a measured shift. You can see in the vid how they apologize for Darwin because he did not know about molecular biology, etc.  So they are trying to let liberalism down gently but make no mistake, it's going down.  Besides, a good scientist always knows there are unknown unknowns.  Darwin's supporters acted like it was gospel and to this day treat it as a religion - that of humanism.

All you had to to was look around and see how abundant life is on Earth, and how absent it is from every other place we have ever looked for it.  IF piles of chemicals could just self organize and become sentient beings over time then it would happen all the time all over the solar system.  They might not look like humans because of different growth mediums and environments, but the laws of chance dictate that it should have happened.  But it hasn't.  And it won't.  Because as someone who actually creates things from scratch I can tell you, it takes intelligent design to create.  As you might have heard in the video, life is literally encoded, just like software.

If things would self-create we would have definitive evidence of that by now.  And as those in the video said, even Darwin put a time limit on his theory.  He said it would be obvious in time that new species were evolving from existing ones.  But that is not happening and so even Darwin would say he was wrong.  And don't tell me (in the usual liberal tactic) that we just need to wait longer, that if we just do more of what didn't work in the past that somehow it will work in the future.  The changes Darwin used as proof points happened over the course of not many years.  Original of Species was published in 1859.  160 years should be enough time for substantial proof of the evolution of a new species to evolve if it was ever going to happen.

Bye bye Darwin, off to the dustbin of science fact with you and your disciples!