On several occasions in the past I wanted to make a point about how
Elliott wave analysis is far different than what most people think of
when they hear "technical analysis". I have done this several times on
this blog in order to try to communicate my strong feeling that Elliott
waves are something special in nature. My topping call on IBM
has to go down as a classic not just because I was in fact the only one
calling it down at the time but also because of the background I
provided at the time which was that IBM was looking like a big leader of
vastly advanced tech - game changing things in the case of atom
manipulation and of Artificial Intelligence. All of these things
signaled blue skies and fair weather for the share price.
Despite these bullish appearing conditions
I clearly called the top almost exactly and I didn't hem or haw in my
explanation of why I had high confidence in my view. If you haven't
read it lately it is well worth a read at the link above IMO because
while it looked like a very risky public point to make at the time by
those unversed in Elliott waves, it was actually the most likely thing
to happen from the Elliott wave model point of view. My trading
experience tells me to follow the wave model and you won't go far wrong.
I've made other similar posts which just seemed to be insane at the time. Anyone invested in Western Digital when I presented my Elliott wave model
which indicated high probability that it was peaking and ready to come
falling back to Earth would have gotten angry at me to no end for
talking that way about their little darling when I wrote that "is is looking not just a little bit peaky but scarily so."
Of course I presented a model analysis of the data to back up my fears
but people tend to fall in love with an idea and they don't want to
consider other viewpoints. That goes double when they hear chartists
speaking chart jargon because there are so many well meaning hacks out
there. Of course that didn't stop WDC from collapsing back down to ~$35
before catching a bid again. Again, I challenge you to carefully read
what I wrote back then and why I wrote it, especially the part, "From every outward appearance, WDC is a solid buy. So why can I confidently predict a major collapse in the share price of
this company over the next 5 years? Why am I confident enough to write
it down and promise never to erase this post? The answer of course is the chart.".
You
might recall me also challenging Wall St veteran technical analyst Sam
Collins on several occasions. He's the kind of pseudo expert that
people tend to follow only to conclude later on that technical analysis
is "bullshit". For example there was his call on Gilead Sciences
(ticker:GILD) being a "cornerstone holding" of your portfolio. My
response was clear: run away from GILD. Not because I know a damned
thing about the health-tech sector mind you, but rather because I know a
lot about Elliott waves. You can (and should) read my post on that here.
Long story short, if GILD was your cornerstone then your investment
house would look like the leaning tower of Pisa because whereas GILD was
trading at $109 back then (red circle is when I made my post), it
trades at only $67 today.
In
that post I also mentioned another challenge that I had made to a Sam
Collins call and I just noticed I have not followed up on it for a long
while. Here is my first and original post on American Express
(AMEX) in which I told people clearly that this looked like a
corrective formation from an Elliott wave perspective. In fact I wrote,
"anyone buying this thing at these levels needs to get a stiff beating by the Ponzi Police for the crime of cluelessness".
Now I know it seems like I'm taking a real chance making these kinds of
posts but experience is that Elliott wave analysis will be correct
about 70% of the time for a good analyst. The shares were trading at
~$90 at the time. 2 scant years later they had collapsed to $50 before
catching a bid. And both of these collapses happened in opposition to
the broader indices like the DJIA, SPX and NDX.
An
important event is likely coming soon to the markets. Those who have
some advance warning and triggers to look for will be able to do the
right thing at the right time. Everyone else isn't going to see it
coming. If you want to be among those with the best odds of navigating
the coming waves and staying afloat then I recommend not waiting until
events engulf us before subscribing to my service. If I haven't
convinced you about the value I bring to the trading table with all of
these free examples over the years then it really makes me wonder what
it will take to convince you.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi and welcome to my blog. Comments have been enabled for anyone with a google account.