Mini lesson on the physics of 9-11; will Canada lead the way to a real investigation?

Here is a very short 2 minute video of some Russian building demo wannabes trying to purposely destroy an apparently derelict  11 story (cannot fully see the first floor due to camera angle) reinforced concrete apartment building.  They apparently did not place enough charges in the upper floors and were simply hoping for it to behave like 911 where 3 buildings just magically collapsed into their own footprints at the speed of gravity.  After all, the 911 vids made it look so easy!  Why shouldn't any Russian country boy and a few boxes of C4 be able to achieve the same result?

Now, think about 911 folks.  Think about all of that pulverized concrete that blanketed the area.  How do you think concrete pulverizes like that??  It take a lot of concentrated energy for sure.  Look at the top floors of the Russian building.  They do not "pancake" as we were told to believe happened to 3 buildings on the same day on 911.  The unexploded portion of the building remains intact, hits the ground as a unit and then darned near falls over on its side.  There is no pyroclastic dust cloud from the top floors because those responsible for that work did not wire the whole building, only the lower floor.

That is how real buildings fall down unless they are pulverized on each floor by explosives.  That is what happens if you leave support anywhere in the chain.  If you ever get the chance to watch real pros take on the task of building demo, watch the videos from Controlled Demolition inc. (the Loizeaux family) on YouTube.  You will see how careful they have to be, how well their planning must be done and how much risk exists that things will go wrong leading to a partial demo that is an even bigger problem than before a demo was attempted.  The lesson that thinking people will take away from this is that it is very difficult to completely demo a large building!

So basically, three buildings collapsed on 911 into their own footprints in exactly the same manner, all accompanied by clouds of pyroclastic dust (hot pulverized concrete).  None were partials.  None fell over on their side where they might hit real estate that was still of value (WTC 1,2 and 7 were all at end of life).

But the WTC buildings were significantly unlike that YouTube Russian concrete building in one main aspect: they were far, far stronger.  Note in the video above, the Russian building is steel-reinforced concrete.  You can see the re-bar sticking out the top of the unfinished building.  But the WTC buildings were all steel frame buildings.  The main support was steel I-beams which do not just pulverize so easily like concrete.  You can see from the picture below taken from this web site just how that was handled.   The massive steel beams did not "pancake", they were cut at a very severe angle so that the building they supported would slide off of them like snow off of an Alpine home's roof.   Look at the perfection of that cut.  It was obviously done by some kind of shaped charge which I know a little something about having served as a 46170 in the USAF (munitions).

Note the angle on the cut above.  Now look at building demo people (not related in any way to 911) place shaped charges on a concrete pillar of a building they are setting up for demo.  It is the same angle as the steel beam above because that's just how the pros do it!

This is what a shaped charge looks like up close.  Shaped charges are specifically designed to cut in a directional fashion.  You can see the fine line of energy coming out the bottom of that vee toward the camera:

The "vee" concentrates the explosive force in the direction opposite that it is pointing and when it goes off it sends a superheated copper projectile into the intended area.  Here is what a steel beam looks like after a known shaped charge was used on it:

If you have trouble believing that what is essentially an explosion can produce this kind of focused cut, here is a short video showing just how focused that shaped charge is when properly formed.  Don't trust your gut folks, trust the data.
 
The cut in the photo above is identical to the precision cut on the steel support girder of WTC shown at top.  Note: some on the Internet say that the girder in the top pic might have been cut after the building collapsed as part of the cleanup.  This is the flimsy kind of evidence that underpins the so called "debunking" of 911 controlled demo science.  Of course, that is bullshit on 3 levels:

1. while that cut is pretty straight, it is not clean like a cutting torch would do.  Ever used a cutting torch?  I have.  They leave very clean edges, not the ragged edge you see above.
1. At right is a view of what modern plasma cutting equipment is capable of doing.  Yes this was done by a robot and no they would not have used a robot for the cleanup but they would likely use a straight edge simply to achieve the maximum cutting efficiency.  Besides, a professional welder can cut pretty cleanly even freehand. 
2.  nobody is going to sit there and cut at that angle because when it breaks loose it will fall dangerously close to the person cutting.  Instead, they would cut around the perimeter and then push it over in the intended direction in a way that is safe and easy to control.
3. the picture shows firemen on the scene.  They were part of original search and rescue and these guys look intently involved in doing that work.  Who had time to haul in cutting torches that quickly and begin to cut down beams like that?  Nobody, that's who.  Besides, why begin the cleanup in the middle of the debris field?  Why haul equipment into that mess?  Workers would probably clear the exterior debris before taking on a risky cut like the one shown.  Which of course is more evidence that workers did not do this.

If you have spent most of the time since 911 believing the official propaganda and lies about how and why this happened, it's about time to wake up, don't you think?  Stop trusting your gut instinct in this matter because your herding behavior has been used as a weapon against you by people who certainly know how it works and how to manipulate the masses with propaganda.  Intelligent people do not blindly listen to just one side of a story.  They look at all the facts (not just unsupported and theoretical claims like the government makes about "pancaking") but actual facts.  Thinking people make up their own minds without regard for what the fish, bird or sheeple standing next to them in the herd thinks.

It's been a long standing prediction of mine that willful ignorance of the herd will evaporate when the credit Ponzi begins to roll over.  The leaders at some point in time figure out that there is no way forward without some kind of public accounting for past crimes.  The NYT is demanding it for the US torture regime but at some point the topic will turn back to 911 and in fact it is now finally making progress in Canada of all places.
 
Just because collapse has not been felt in the US yet, don't think we will escape it.  Look at Russia now: overnight lending rates are 19%.  The Ruble has fallen into rubble.  I expect similar problems to soon emerge in Japan and then China and then finally the good old Eye of Horus on top of the pyramid here in the USA.  First deflation and then massive inflation. That is what I always expected based on my supernova economy theory which is only enabled to happen by the presence of a fake, fraudulent money supply.