Sunday, December 8, 2013

Bitcoin update - likely near major inflection point.

In this post I discussed Bitcoin for the first time ever at the request of a reader.  At the time, Bitcoin was still skyrocketing.  Needless to say, I did not provide a positive looking chart model for it.  While significantly undershooting the peak price, I so far seem to have gotten the fact that a major reversal was in the cards.


I wrote, "But for all of its benefits, Bitcoins are not tangible.  If the government is threatened by it, the government could shut it all down literally overnight with the stroke of a pen.  Don't think they are above doing this because they are not."

Government intervention is in fact my top fear about bitcoins, right up there with buying into charts that have already begun to go exponential.

"So good luck with Bitcoins folks.  Maybe it really is different this time.  But then again maybe not.  And no matter what you think about them, don't chase them into the stratosphere thinking that trees will grow to the sky because, as soon as you do, the trap door will open under your feet leaving you to freefall back to Earth clutching desperately at digital nothingness."

So what comes next?  Well it depends on the wave count.  When I first looked at it some days ago, I found a blip early on that was large in terms of percentage gains but tiny in comparison to the blip at left in the chart above and almost nonexistent relative to the large exponential explosion on the right.  So the key is this: if the tiny blip at the start of the chart (which is not shown above due to size of chart) was 1 and then the small blip at left in the chart above was 3 and the exponential run at right was 5.  In that case, the a-b-c retracement is likely to retrace all the way back down to the level of the prior 4th.  In other words follow the red line down on the model above.

But if that little off chart blip was just part of 1 (and the blip up left above is therefore 1, then that exponential explosion was only 3, not 5.  In that case, the chart might already have pulled back because of China's recent banning of Bitcoins and be ready for yet another run up.  That would be the blue line.

So basically I don't know whether the next step would be hugely up or down but I do suspect the chart is at a major inflection point: either 1 more big wave up into 5 or a-b-c back down to the prior 4th.  Bitcoin was heavily in use in China so the recent ban could really hurt the overall popularity of it.  That ban news alone seems powerful enough to kick BTC back down into the dirt.  But until we get some more data it would be very difficult to make an accurate EW call at this point.

In any case, the key take away is just what I wrote initially: governments can, with the stroke of a pen, wipe out Bitcoin.  Thus Bitcoin is not the new gold, the old gold, or any kind of gold.  It is just a digital currency that is unbacked by anything.  It provides a way for people to trade outside of government taxation and outside of government monitoring.  Sure, great for the people but who gives a damn about what's good for the people?  The government?  Ha!  Government is out for itself and it needs to steal from the people in order to thrive or to even survive.  Letting people trade between themselves without taxing every transaction will wipe out the corrupt government and that is not going to happen without a fight.

 I'm not saying people can't do well in using these digital currencies.  Obviously some gamblers have done very well with them.  I'm just saying that it is a huge gamble as to whether Bitcoin et al. even exist in 2 years.  Gold is no such gamble.  Gold will outlive all of us.  Gold was around before the first human and it will be around long after we all kill each other off.

2 comments:

  1. While the state's pen could make things difficult for Bitcoin within a jurisdiction, all national jurisdictions would have to ban it for it to really be wiped out. As a matter of fact, other things were banned by states, yet their value actually went up, like drugs. As long as people see value in Bitcoin, no state will effectively bane it. This is the actual question. Of course, people have credit value to Au for eons, and even when a hick banned it decades ago it's retained its full value. Whether Bitcoin lives up to this golden standard remains to be seen, but I wouldn't write it off so easily because of a pen.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is always a black market for everything. But the herd doesn't want to sneak around. If the government bans something then it is relegated to the black market and will not be mainstream.

    Keep in mind that the hope of Bitcoiners is to displace government money with this new private digital money. If they have to live in the shadows then some will do it but not the masses, not corporations, etc. In other words, in that case it will be a mania flash in the pan and bitcoins will trade some day at some value lower than where they started.

    I think the odds that Bitcoin et al. will turn out to be manias are high simply because if they become too widespread, understood and accepted then the government would get cut out of the deal and that will not happen without a war.

    More likely, government comes up with its own digital competitor to bitcoin but in the government's version you have to go through government exchanges and government monitoring and government control/manipulation "for your own good".

    ReplyDelete

Hi and welcome to my blog. Comments have been enabled for anyone with a google account.

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More